Helm

ITAD malformed recipient fallback policy follow-on

Capture and resolve the unresolved malformed-recipient fallback policy ambiguity from run-003 under explicit human decision.

Draft

Worker

Cursor

Executes tasks

Reviewer

Claude

Reviews output

Next valid states

Awaiting Review, Superseded

Policy & provenance▾

Policy guardrails

Human decision requiredYes
Silent execution allowedNo
Max worker tools/cycle1
Max reviewers/cycle1
Token budget4,000

Provenance

branch: cursor/helm-project-scaffolding-cf85
commit: ad46b50
worker: human
reviewer: human
files: docs/CURRENT_STATE.md, docs/COMMAND_CENTER_CONTRACT.md

Action required

Resolve flagged governance checks before moving to the next stage.

Steps, evidence & decisions

Run lifecycle

Status: Created

Workflow

Define the issue
Gather evidence
Review findings
Record decision
Send next action

Execution summary

This run was not created from a Discuss dispatch, or dispatch data is not available.

Status and next step

Current stage

Draft

Checklist

1 check flagged

Latest review

No review yet

⚡ Action required

Resolve flagged governance checks before moving to the next stage.

Evidence summary

1 item of evidence.

Follow-on run opening packetprompt_packet

Tasks

Prepare follow-on clarification packet
Todo
Create first packet for run-004 to resolve malformed-recipient fallback policy ambiguity.
Continue

What to do next: add evidence or record a decision when ready.

Owner: Human

Status: Todo

Create first packet for run-004 to resolve malformed-recipient fallback policy ambiguity.

Input artifacts: none

Output artifacts: Follow-on run opening packet

Record decision

View recorded decisions and record new ones below.

Recorded by: human

Decision: Draft

Recorded at: 2026-03-12T20:28:00.000Z

Follow-on run opened to resolve malformed-recipient fallback policy ambiguity before implementation.

Profile enforcement checks

Forbidden Terms Scan • Pass

No forbidden terms detected in run artifacts.

Missing Ambiguity Section • Flagged

No ambiguity section detected in current artifacts.

Recommendation Or Ranking Language • Pass

No recommendation/ranking language detected.

Missing Explicit Structural Confirmation • Pass

All AI-mediated tasks include explicit structural confirmation notes.

Source conflict

Updated: 2026-03-12T20:28:00.000Z

Use this section when a trusted source of truth disagrees with what you are seeing in the system. Capture both views and what is still unclear.

Record evidence and decisions

Only you can advance this; nothing runs automatically.

Current stage: Draft

branch name

Optional: branch where these changes live (for traceability).

commit hash

Optional: commit SHA you are reviewing or approving.

changed file paths (comma separated)

Optional: list key files touched, separated by commas.

test commands run (comma separated)

Optional: commands you ran to check this change (e.g. npm test).

screenshot references (comma separated)

Optional: links or IDs for any screenshots you captured.

Step 1: Save evidence

Write down what changed and any open questions so others can see the evidence.

Step 2: Save reviewer update

Summarize your review and whether the evidence looks ready, needs changes, or is blocked.

Reviewer verdict

Step 3: Record decision

Choose the next stage for this work item and record a short note about your decision.

Reviewer findings

No reviewer notes recorded yet.