Helm

← Home

Add review + approval flow

Normalize tool outputs and formalize human approvals with explicit gates.

Review complete

Worker

ChatGPT

Executes tasks

Reviewer

Cursor

Reviews output

Next valid states

Awaiting Human Decision, Rejected, Superseded

Policy & provenance▾

Policy guardrails

Human decision requiredYes
Silent execution allowedNo
Max worker tools/cycle1
Max reviewers/cycle1
Token budget9,000

Provenance

branch: cursor/helm-project-scaffolding-cf85
commit: dbf9749
worker: chatgpt
reviewer: cursor
files: src/lib/utils/review-result.ts, src/components/run/review-panel.tsx

Action required

Resolve flagged governance checks before moving to the next stage.

Steps, evidence & decisions

Run lifecycle

Status: Created

Workflow

Define the issue
Gather evidence
Review findings
Record decision
Send next action

Execution summary

This run was not created from a Discuss dispatch, or dispatch data is not available.

Status and next step

Current stage

Review Complete

Checklist

2 checks flagged

Latest review

Changes Requested

⚡ Action required

Resolve flagged governance checks before moving to the next stage.

Evidence summary

1 item of evidence.

Schema validation outputreview

Tasks

Define review schema
Done
Add strict schema validation for review payloads from external reviewer tools.
Continue

What to do next: add evidence or record a decision when ready.

Owner: Worker

Status: Done

Add strict schema validation for review payloads from external reviewer tools.

Input artifacts: none

Output artifacts: Schema validation output

Record decision

View recorded decisions and record new ones below.

Recorded by: human

Decision: Review Complete

Recorded at: 2026-03-12T15:45:00.000Z

Review finished with one medium-severity finding awaiting operator action.

Profile enforcement checks

Forbidden Terms Scan • Pass

No forbidden terms detected in run artifacts.

Missing Ambiguity Section • Flagged

No ambiguity section detected in current artifacts.

Recommendation Or Ranking Language • Pass

No recommendation/ranking language detected.

Missing Explicit Structural Confirmation • Flagged

Missing confirmation note for tasks: task-201 (Define review schema).

Source conflict

Updated: 2026-03-12T15:50:00.000Z

Use this section when a trusted source of truth disagrees with what you are seeing in the system. Capture both views and what is still unclear.

Record evidence and decisions

Only you can advance this; nothing runs automatically.

Current stage: Review Complete

branch name

Optional: branch where these changes live (for traceability).

commit hash

Optional: commit SHA you are reviewing or approving.

changed file paths (comma separated)

Optional: list key files touched, separated by commas.

test commands run (comma separated)

Optional: commands you ran to check this change (e.g. npm test).

screenshot references (comma separated)

Optional: links or IDs for any screenshots you captured.

Step 1: Save evidence

Write down what changed and any open questions so others can see the evidence.

Step 2: Save reviewer update

Summarize your review and whether the evidence looks ready, needs changes, or is blocked.

Reviewer verdict

Step 3: Record decision

Choose the next stage for this work item and record a short note about your decision.

Reviewer findings

Reviewer: Cursor

Verdict: Changes Requested

Approval gate is present, but pending status messaging is unclear for operators.

[Medium] (Define review schema) Clarify copy in approval panel when run status is awaiting_review.

Suggested next actions

Update approval panel wording
Add a short operator note about human decision requirement